IN RE WELFARE OF G.S.P.

No. C7-99-1028.

610 N.W.2d 651 (2000)

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF G.S.P.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 25, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann E. Winking, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant G.S.P.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, and John J. Muhar, Itasca County Attorney, Michael J. Haig, Assistant County Attorney, Grand Rapids, for respondent State of Minnesota.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge, G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, a juvenile, alleges that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress statements made by appellant and in determining that the state had proven appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude that appellant's statements were inadmissible because they were taken in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, and we reverse.

FACTS

On the second day of the school year in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases