ALMADA v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

No. CV 98-73 TUC JMR.

153 F.Supp.2d 1108 (2000)

Edward ALMADA and Mary Almada, Plaintiffs, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

April 11, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl E. MacOmber, Russo Cox & Russo PC, Tucson, AZ, for plaintiffs.

Floyd P. Bienstock, Lisa Morganstern Bickel, Elizabeth Anne Schallop Call, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant.


ORDER

ROLL, District Judge.

This order addresses Defendant Allstate Insurance Co., Inc.'s (Allstate) Motion for Summary Judgment on a breach of contract claim brought by Plaintiffs Edward Almada (Almada) and his wife. Because Almada was an at-will employee who was lawfully terminated, Allstate is entitled to summary judgment. Even assuming good cause for termination was required, there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding Allstate's good...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases