Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant's contention that County Court should have precluded the in-court identification by the eyewitness for lack of notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (b) is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to move to preclude the evidence on that ground (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Pagan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.