1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 210 F.3d
  5. 210 F.3d 1033 (2000)
 

HOLLISTER v. TUTTLE

No. 98-35058.

210 F.3d 1033 (2000)

Michael A. HOLLISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert TUTTLE; John Cooper; Peter Carafiol; Shelley Reece; Marvin Kaiser; Deanne Westbrook; Elaine Limbaugh; Christine Thompson; Susan Danielson, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 30, 2000

Amended April 28, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian R. Talcott and G. Kenneth Shiroishi, Michael Francis, Dunn, Carney, Allen, Higgins & Tongue, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: NOONAN, GRABER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 30, 2000 is amended as follows:

Slip Opinion at 3670, Line 28 (Fourth Paragraph, Second Sentence). Insert "generally" between "number of units" and "be treated", so that the sentence reads: "nor can a reduction in the number of units generally be treated as a kind of demotion." Slip Opinion at 3670, Line 30 (Fourth Paragraph, Fourth Sentence). Insert, "In this case," at the beginning of the sentence so that it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases