1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 766 A.2d
  5. 766 A.2d 475 (2000)
 

FORTT v. STATE

No. 543, 1999.

766 A.2d 475 (2000)

Tschaka W. FORTT, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: December 19, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond M. Radulski, Esquire, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellant.

Kim Ayvazian, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and STEELE, Justices.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal from the Superior Court, the appellant contends that his convictions for drug trafficking and possession with intent to deliver drugs are not supported by sufficient evidence and in any event constitute violations of the double jeopardy clause of the Delaware Constitution. We find no merit in either contention and accordingly affirm the convictions.

I

In October 1999, the New Castle County Police Department conducted an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases