LUND v. SOUTHAM

No. C7-00-579.

617 N.W.2d 623 (2000)

Robert T. LUND, Respondent, v. Adam G. SOUTHAM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 10, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bricker Lavik, A. Minnie Alexander, Dorsey & Whitney, L.L.P., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Todd M. Johnson, Johnson Law Group L.L.P., Minnetonka, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge, CRIPPEN, Judge, and WILLIS, Judge.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge

Granting a summary judgment to respondent Robert Lund in his suit on a $65,000 note, the trial court determined that appellant Adam Southam could not introduce evidence of respondent's failure to perform a promise allegedly constituting consideration for the note. Because the court erred in determining that the purported promise of respondent modified the note, and because appellant's parol evidence is not otherwise inadmissible, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases