TART v. MARTIN

No. COA99-401.

527 S.E.2d 708 (2000)

Willie B. TART, Plaintiff, v. James L. MARTIN and Peggy H. Martin, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 4, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schlosser, Neill & Brackett, by Wilbur L. Linton, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Teague, Rotenstreich & Stanaland, L.L.P., by Kenneth B. Rotenstreich and Ian J. Drake, Greensboro, for defendant-appellees.


EAGLES, Chief Judge.

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C.R.Civ.P. 56(c). On motion for summary judgment, the court must closely scrutinize the papers of the party moving for summary judgment, drawing all inferences from proof in favor of the non-movant. Shuford, N.C.Practice and Procedure, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases