PLOTKIN v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

(LUBA 98-133; CA A107171)

997 P.2d 226 (2000)

165 Or. App. 246

Martin PLOTKIN, Robin Plotkin, O. Meredith Wilson, Jr., and Theodora Anne Wilson, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY and Bob Powne, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Batchelor argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners—cross-respondents Plotkin and Wilson.

Alan A. Rappleyea, Sr. Assistant County Counsel, filed the brief for respondent-cross-petitioner Washington County.

Stuart K. Cohen, Portland, argued the cause for respondent—cross-petitioner Powne. With him on the brief was Copeland, Landye, Bennett and Wolf.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and KISTLER, Judge.


KISTLER, J.

Petitioners appealed to LUBA from a Washington County hearings officer's preliminary approval of a 12-lot residential subdivision on a five-acre parcel. The parcel is located in an area that is designated "wildlife habitat" and that contains two wetland areas that have not been identified as resource lands in the county's comprehensive plan documents. LUBA rejected petitioners' contentions that the county's decision was inconsistent with provisions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases