A jury found James Gresham guilty of one count of entering an automobile with intent to commit theft. On appeal, Gresham argues that the trial court erred by admitting impermissibly suggestive identification evidence. Gresham also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the denial of his motion for directed verdict. We affirm.
As recognized in cases such as Shabazz v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
