Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that his conviction of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) must be reversed because he may have been convicted of a crime for which he was not indicted. We disagree. Defendant was charged under count one of the indictment with burglary in the second degree arising from his illegal entry into a residence between March 15 and March 25, 1995 and theft of items from that residence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.