1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 96 F.Supp.2d
  5. 96 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2000)
 

U.S. v. HOWICK

No. CR 99-11-BU-DWM.

96 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edward Keith HOWICK, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division.

May 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kris A. McLean, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for U.S.

Anthony R. Gallagher, Federal Defenders of Montana—Great Falls Branch, Great Falls, MT, for Edward Keith Howick.

ORDER

MOLLOY, District Judge.

One aspect of Howick's Rule 29 motion was precipitated by a jury question. During deliberations the jury asked what the phrase "bringing into" meant. They wanted to know if it required physical possession and control, or if it meant that one causes an object to be brought into the United States. Counsel for Howick asked that no further instruction on the meaning of the term be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases