1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 89 F.Supp.2d
  5. 89 F.Supp.2d 29 (2000)
 

LEDERMAN v. U.S.

No. CIV. A. 99-3359 (RWR).

89 F.Supp.2d 29 (2000)

Robert LEDERMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal Goldfarb, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, Arlington, VA, for Plaintiff.

Marina Utgoff Braswell, United States Attorney's Office, Eugene A. Adams, III, Kimberly C. Matthews, Thomas L. Koger, Allison Alvarado, Office of Corporation Counsel, D.C., Washington, D.C., for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERTS, District Judge.

This suit involves a statutory and constitutional challenge to the creation and enforcement of a regulation governing expressive activity in the area immediately around the United States Capitol. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment with respect to the validity of the regulation. Because I find that the regulation is reasonably related to the purpose of the enabling statute, but is not narrowly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases