HOOGENBOOM v. GILMORE, JR.


278 A.D.2d 895 (2000)

719 N.Y.S.2d 791

FREDERICK HOOGENBOOM et al., Respondents, v. RONALD P. GILMORE, JR., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided December 27, 2000.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly denied those parts of defendants' motions and cross motions to dismiss the complaints upon the ground of forum non conveniens. That doctrine "should be applied only when it plainly appears that New York is an inconvenient forum and that the action has no nexus to this State" (Shepherd Showcase v Pekala, 138 A.D.2d 960...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases