1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 184 Misc.2d
  5. 184 Misc.2d 982 (2000)
 

PING LEE v. LIN

184 Misc.2d 982 (2000)

712 N.Y.S.2d 740

PING LEE, Appellant, v. PETER LIN et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

June 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ping Lee, New York City, appellant pro se.

Daniel L. Feldman, Flushing, for respondents.

KASSOFF, P. J., ARONIN and CHETTA, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

The court's determination, denying plaintiff's motion to punish defendants for contempt, constituted a proper exercise of its discretion (see, 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 3126.06). Contempt is not a sanction listed in CPLR 3126 for a party's failure to comply with disclosure. While said section does allow the court to impose, in addition to the sanctions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases