1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 88 Ohio
  5. 88 Ohio St.3d 27 (2000)
 

MOORE v. STATE AUTO. MUT. INS. CO.

No. 98-2495.

88 Ohio St.3d 27 (2000)

MOORE, APPELLANT, v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Jack Clapp & Associates Co., L.P.A., R. Jack Clapp and Timothy A Ita, for appellant.

Flynn, Py & Kruse, L.P.A., John D. Py and James W. Hart, for appellee.

DOUGLAS, J.

The central issue for our determination in this case is whether the insurance policy limitation enforced by the courts below is valid under Ohio law. In order for a limitation on uninsured motorist coverage to be valid it must not be contrary to the coverage mandated by R.C. 3937.18(A). Sexton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 431

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases