STEENWERTH v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA


273 A.D.2d 878 (2000)

710 N.Y.S.2d 270

JASON STEENWERTH, Respondent, v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided June 16, 2000.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff alleged that his injuries were caused by the dangerous condition of defendant's front step. Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). Contrary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases