1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 725 N.E.2d
  5. 725 N.E.2d 425 (2000)
 

GILMAN v. HOHMAN

No. 49A02-9904-CV-300.

725 N.E.2d 425 (2000)

David GILMAN and William E. Statham, Appellants-Defendants, v. Sandra HOHMAN, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

March 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Wampler, Eric D. Johnson, Pfenne P. Cantrell, Kightlinger & Gray, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant David Gilman.

Todd J. Kaiser, Daniel M. Long, Locke Reynolds Boyd & Weisell, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant William E. Statham.

Kevin W. Betz, Sutherlin & Betz, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

David Gilman and William Statham appeal from the trial court's denial of their partial motion for summary judgment in Sandra Hohman's action against them for malpractice. We reverse and remand.

Issues

Gilman and Statham raise one issue for our review, which we restate as whether the trial court properly denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases