HOWELL TP. v. ROOTO CORP.

Docket No. 115105.

617 N.W.2d 533 (2000)

463 Mich. 347

HOWELL TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROOTO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 12, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C. (by Charles E. Barbieri and Michael R. Huber), Lansing, MI, for the plaintiff-appellee.

The Kizer Law Firm, P.C. (by Thomas Kizer, Jr., and Darrell L. Cho), Howell Township, MI, for the defendant-appellant.


Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Not long after passing an ordinance, Howell Township confronted a situation that the ordinance would govern. However, that measure, while published, had not yet been recorded in the township's book of ordinances. In an ensuing lawsuit, the circuit court granted summary disposition to Rooto Corporation, against whom the ordinance was invoked, holding that it was not enforceable because it was unrecorded. The Court of Appeals reversed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases