HOEFER v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC.

No. SACV98447-GLT[KY].

92 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2000)

Patrick C. HOEFER, Plaintiff, v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC., et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

April 7, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Pace, Pace & Rose, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Donovan Cocas, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.


REVISED ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

TAYLOR, District Judge.

On a motion for reconsideration of the federal preemption issue, the Court withdraws its May 25, 1999 order Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel, Inc., 50 F.Supp.2d 975 (C.D.Cal.1999), and issues this revised order. Concerning three issues not yet decided by the Ninth Circuit, the Court holds California's False Claims Act does not protect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases