1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 1 P.3d
  5. 1 P.3d 113 (2000)
 

LOGERQUIST v. McVEY

No. CV-98-0587-PR.

1 P.3d 113 (2000)

196 Ariz. 470

Kim E. LOGERQUIST, a single woman, Petitioner. v. Hon. Michael R. McVEY, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, John T. Danforth, M.D. and Mary Jean Danforth, his wife; John T. Danforth, P.C., Real Parties in Interest.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

April 19, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turley, Swan & Childers, P.C. By: Kent E. Turley, Phoenix, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Teilborg, Sanders & Parks, P.C. By: Frank A. Parks, Kari B. Zangerle, Donald A. Lawson, Phoenix, Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Applying the rule of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), the trial judge entered an order precluding "expert testimony of Plaintiff's alleged repressed memory." We granted review to clarify Rule 702, Arizona Rules of Evidence, which governs the admission of opinion testimony.

¶ 2 The construction and application of Rule 702 has become an issue of nationwide concern following the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases