Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying in its entirety the motion of Buffalo Sewer Authority (defendant) to compel discovery of documents alleged by plaintiff to be material prepared for litigation (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [2]) or protected by the attorney-client privilege (see, CPLR 3101 [b]; Rossi v Blue Cross & Blue Shield,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY v. BUFFALO SEWER AUTHORITY
272 A.D.2d 853 (2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 678
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent, v. BUFFALO SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 10, 2000.
Decided May 10, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
