Pairoj NIKRODHANONDHA, Petitioner,
v.
Janet RENO, as Attorney General of the United States; Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; the Immigration and Naturalization Service; and Brian R. Perryman, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 30, 1999.
Decided February 3, 2000.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carlina Tapia-Ruano (argued), Minsky, McCormick & Hallagan, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.
Janet Reno, pro se.
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Chicago, IL, Kristal A. Marlow, Paul D. Kovac (argued), Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Janet Reno.
Janet Reno, U.S. Atty., Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Chicago, IL, Michelle E. Gorden, Paul D. Kovac, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Doris Meissner.
Janet Reno, U.S. Atty., Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Chicago, IL, Margaret J. Perry, Paul D. Kovac, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Janet Reno, U.S. Atty., Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Chicago, IL, Robert L. Bombaugh, Paul D. Kovac, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Brian R. Perryman.
Before WOOD, Jr., COFFEY and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, Pairoj Nikrodhanondha, a native and citizen of Thailand, entered the United States on a conditional resident status based on his marriage to Darlene Sincere, a United States citizen.1 In order to remove the conditional basis of his immigration status, Nikrodhanondha and Darlene filed a "Joint Petition to Remove the Conditional Basis of an Alien's Permanent Resident Status" on June 28, 1989. An Immigration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
