TOMIKA INV. v. MACEDONIA TRUE VINE

No. COA98-1387.

524 S.E.2d 591 (2000)

TOMIKA INVESTMENTS, INC., Tomika Investment Co. and Thomas Latimer, Plaintiffs, v. MACEDONIA TRUE VINE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH OF GOD, INC., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 1, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parrish, Newton & Rabil, LLP, by Daniel R. Johnston, and T. Lawson Newton, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff appellees.

Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A., by John W. Gresham, Charlotte; and Tucker & Hughes, P.C., by Clarence B. Tucker, Sr., Detroit, MI, for defendant appellant.


HORTON, Judge.

Defendant raises three questions on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment on defendant's claim that the deed to its property was void; (II) whether the trial court erred during the trial of this matter in refusing to allow evidence that could have been used to establish the value of defendant's property; and (III) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases