1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 5 P.3d
  5. 5 P.3d 1109 (2000)
 

STATE v. HANSZ

(C9602-31509; CA A102267)

5 P.3d 1109 (2000)

167 Or. App. 147

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Jonathan Michael HANSZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas C. Patton, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.

BREWER, J.

Defendant was tried and convicted on stipulated facts for unlawful possession of a Schedule II controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(b). In a single assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to an amendment by interlineation of the charging instrument that changed the identity of the controlled substance in question from cocaine to methamphetamine. Defendant asserts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases