SHAH v. HOWARD JOHNSON

No. COA99-964.

535 S.E.2d 577 (2000)

Bharat SHAH, Employee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD JOHNSON, Employer, Self-Insured, Key Risk Management Services, Servicing Agent, Defendant-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 19, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Sumwalt, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellant-appellee.

Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by Hatcher Kincheloe and Sharon E. Dent, Charlotte, for defendant appellant-appellee.


HORTON, Judge.

The law governing appellate review of Industrial Commission decisions is well settled in this state. Review "is limited to a determination of (1) whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and (2) whether the conclusions of law are supported by the findings." Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329, 331, 266 S.E.2d 676, 678, reh'g denied,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases