SPRINGFIELD TERM. RY. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP.


754 A.2d 353 (2000)

2000 ME 126

SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided June 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thad B. Zmistowski, Eaton Peabody Bradford & Veague, P.A., Bangor, for plaintiff.

Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Christopher C. Jernigan, Asst. Attorney General (orally), James E. Smith, Chief Counsel, Department of Transportation, Augusta, for defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.


CLIFFORD, J.

[¶ 1] Springfield Terminal Railway Company appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) in favor of the Department of Transportation affirming the Department's decision to refuse to produce thirteen documents pursuant to the Freedom of Access Act. See 1 M.R.S.A. § 408 (1989).1 Springfield argues that the trial court erred in deciding that those documents were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases