Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion seeking dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a). The allegation that defendant intentionally ignored a known hazard does not bring the case within the "intentional injury" exception to the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 11; Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.