STATE v. DORIGUZZI


760 A.2d 336 (2000)

334 N.J. Super. 530

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert DORIGUZZI, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Salerno, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Aronsohn Weiner, attorneys; Mr. Salerno, on the brief).

Sean Carpenter, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (William H. Schmidt, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Carpenter of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and ALLEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CIANCIA, J.A.D.

Defendant Robert Doriguzzi was found guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. The evidence against him consisted of observations by police officers at the location where defendant's vehicle was stopped and later at the police station. Those observations were based in large part on defendant's responses to field sobriety tests (FST) and a horizontal gaze nystagmus test (HGN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases