MALLORY v. GARLINGTON-MATHEWS

No. 69965-8.

13 P.3d 1064 (2000)

142 Wash.2d 1010

Mag MALLORY, Petitioner, v. Laveeda GARLINGTON-MATHEWS and Christopher A. Mathews, wife and husband and the marital community thereof; and Harold Chesnin and Ann Bernstein, his wife and the marital community thereof; and the law firm of Mathews Garlington-Mathews and Chesnin, a Washington partnership, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington.

December 5, 2000.


ORDER

Department I of the Court considered this matter at its December 5, 2000, Motion Calendar, and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

IT IS ORDERED:

That the Petition for Review is denied and the Petitioner's motion for attorney fees is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees will be determined by the Supreme Court Commissioner or Clerk pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases