STATE v. COYNE

Nos. 17205-8-III, 17206-6-III.

995 P.2d 78 (2000)

99 Wash.App. 566

STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. Daniel William COYNE, Respondent. State of Washington, Appellant, v. Clinton Joseph Burt, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Ten.

Publication Ordered March 9, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John V. Jensen, Deputy Pros. Atty., Kennewick, WA, for appellant.

Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney & Marchi, Seattle, WA, Daniel William Coyne, Pullman, Pro Se. for respondent.


BROWN, J.

Daniel W. Coyne and Clinton J. Burt successfully sought suppression of drug evidence discovered following a consent search that flowed from Mr. Coyne's effort to recover a lost coat. Because the police had discharged the governmental duty in connection to the lost coat before detaining Mr. Coyne and Mr. Burt without an articulable suspicion to investigate further, we agree that the consent was vitiated by a prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases