1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 106 F.Supp.2d
  5. 106 F.Supp.2d 1 (2000)
 

KUNDRAT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. Civ.A. 99-2085 RMU.

106 F.Supp.2d 1 (2000)

Barbara KUNDRAT, Plaintiff, v. The DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James McPherson, McPherson & Schillesci, New Orleans, Louisiana, Woodley B. Osborne, Osborne & Deutsch, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff, Barbara M. Kundrat.

Stratton C. Strand, Leon Swenson, Assistant Corporation Counsel, General Litigation Division, Corporation Counsel of D.C., Washington, D.C., for the defendants, the District of Columbia, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and the Joint Committee on Judicial Administration of the District of Columbia Courts.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; Granting the Superior Court Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This Title VII discrimination and retaliation case comes before the court upon the plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and the two original defendants' motion to dismiss. The two parties named as defendants in the original complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases