1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 214 F.3d
  5. 214 F.3d 854 (2000)
 

U.S. v. BRIMAR

No. 99-2827.

214 F.3d 854 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Biliki BRIMAH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 26, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aylice Toohey (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.

James D. Tunick (argued), Hill & Associates, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellant.

Before FLAUM, KANNE, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

The defendant Biliki Brimah was convicted and sentenced on one count of distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The defendant now appeals, arguing that the district court erred in failing to apply the exclusionary rule at sentencing to bar the introduction of evidence that the district court determined was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases