1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 97 F.Supp.2d
  5. 97 F.Supp.2d 8 (2000)
 

SHAPIRO, LIFSCHITZ & SCHRAM v. R.E. HAZARD, JR.

No. CIV.A. 96-1079 SSH.

97 F.Supp.2d 8 (2000)

SHAPIRO, LIFSCHITZ & SCHRAM, P.C., Plaintiff, v. R.E. HAZARD, JR., a California Limited Partnership, et al., Defendants. R.E. Hazard, Jr., a California Limited Partnership, et al., Counter-Plaintiffs, v. Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C., Counter-Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 17, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Cohen, Scott L. Nelson, Hugh P. Quinn, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant.

Pamela J. Bethel, Barbara E. Nicastro, Bethel & Nicastro, Washington, DC, for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are (1) plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on all counterclaims, (2) defendants' motion to extend time in which the parties may serve expert reports, (3) defendants' motion for leave to file a discovery request out-of-time, and (4) defendants' motion to extend the time in which defendants may oppose plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on all counterclaims.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases