1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 116 F.Supp.2d
  5. 116 F.Supp.2d 928 (2000)
 

TATTON v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS

No. 5:00-CV-1439.

116 F.Supp.2d 928 (2000)

Mark D. TATTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

October 12, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Tatton, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, pro se, for Mark D. Tatton, Plaintiffs.

John T. McLandrich, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder, Cleveland, OH, Paul J. Cristallo, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., LPA, Solon, Virgil E. Arrington, Jr., City of Cuyahoga Falls, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, Joseph K. Oldham, Oldham & Dowling, Akron, OH, for City of Cuyahoga Falls, Gregory A. Kenepp, Sergeant Blevins, Adrienne J. Welfle, Defendants.

OPINION

GWIN, District Judge.

On September 25, 2000, Defendants City of Cuyahoga Falls ("the City"), Police Officer Gregory Kenepp, and Police Sergeant Blevins filed a motion for summary judgment on the federal and state claims asserted against them by Plaintiff Mark D. Tatton [Doc. 24]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion.

I. Background

This case presents the frequently-recurring conflict between a citizen's right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases