KOBLUK v. UNIVERSITY OF MN

No. C1-99-1932.

613 N.W.2d 425 (2000)

Calvin KOBLUK, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, John Fetrow, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Hennessey, Reuben A. Mjaanes, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (for appellant).

Mark B. Rotenberg, General Counsel, Lorie S. Gildea, Associate General Counsel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (for respondent).

Rebecca H. Hamblin, Education Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (for amicus curiae Education Minnesota).

Considered and decided by DAVIES, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act when it found that respondent employer was not required to give appellant employee a Tennessen warning before it interviewed him regarding incidents within the course and scope of his employment. Because the information he provided was not private or confidential data, we affirm.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases