Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In 1994 the plaintiff commenced an action to prohibit the defendant from constructing a certain fence. The plaintiff claimed that she benefited from an easement by prescription over a portion of the defendant's property, and that the fence in question would interfere with her enjoyment of that easement. By order and judgment (one paper) dated August 29, 1994, the Supreme Court dismissed that action on the merits.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
