1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 770 So.2d
  5. 770 So.2d 252 (2000)
 

GESKE v. STATE

No. 5D99-2615.

770 So.2d 252 (2000)

Scott GESKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

October 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith F. Szachacz and Kepler B. Funk of Funk & Szachacz, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Scott Geske alleges that the trial court erred by allowing the State to present, during the trial below, similar fact evidence of three separate incidents. The similar facts of the first two incidents were properly admitted to prove identity and modus operandi and otherwise satisfied the chief purposes of the rule allowing that evidence. See Fla. Stat. § 90.404(2)(a) (1997). Although the facts involved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases