1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 605 N.W.2d
  5. 605 N.W.2d 414 (2000)
 

PETERSON v. HINZ

No. C5-99-1299.

605 N.W.2d 414 (2000)

Brian J. PETERSON, Respondent, v. William J. HINZ, et al., Appellants, Minneapolis Community Development Agency, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (attorney pro se).

Michael J. Orme, Dana K. Nyquist, Orme & Associates, Ltd., Eagan, MN (for appellants).

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, CRIPPEN, Judge, and DAVIES, Judge.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Initially, the trial court determined that there was no merit to respondent's suit to enforce attorney liens and imposed Rule 11 sanctions in the form of attorney fees against respondent. Appellants dispute the subsequent decision of the court to reverse these sanctions. We affirm.

FACTS

It is undisputed that there is no merit in respondent's suit to enforce the lien. The lien was claimed against homestead property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases