1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 229 F.3d
  5. 229 F.3d 782 (2000)
 

U.S. v. HOLMES

No. 99-10427.

229 F.3d 782 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles HOLMES, aka Slim, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth D. Noel, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Miranda Kane, Office of the United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: David R. THOMPSON, Thomas G. NELSON, and Barry G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted August 10, 2000 — San Francisco, California.

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Charles Holmes appeals his conviction for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). Holmes contends that the district court erred by refusing his request for an informant credibility jury instruction, by allowing a lay witness to identify him from bank surveillance camera photographs, and by denying his motion for a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases