McDOUGALL v. LUMPKIN

No. S-9133.

11 P.3d 990 (2000)

Avis D. McDOUGALL, Appellant, v. Lindsay LUMPKIN II, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

November 3, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Avis D. McDougall, pro se.

Lindsay Lumpkin II, pro se.

Before FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.


OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Avis McDougall appeals from rulings entered when she and Lindsay Lumpkin divorced. We vacate the property division and remand because it was both inequitable and based on clearly erroneous findings. We also vacate the alimony award and remand because of conflicts between that award and the property division, and because of unexplained contradictions between the superior court's oral and written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases