IN RE GRAND JURY EMPANELING OF SPECIAL GRAND JURY

No. 98-6415.

171 F.3d 826 (1999)

In re THE GRAND JURY EMPANELING OF THE SPECIAL GRAND JURY.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided March 19, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Plaisted (Argued) Christopher M. Farella, Walder, Sondak & Brogan, Roseland, N.J., for Appellants.

Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, George S. Leone, Holly K. Kulka (Argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Newark, N.J., for Appellee.

Before: SLOVITER, McKEE and RENDELL, Circuit Judges


OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Three witnesses appeal from the final order of the District Court holding them in civil contempt and ordering them confined for refusing to testify before a grand jury investigating their father. The witnesses justify their refusal to testify on religious grounds and contend that the District Court failed to follow the procedures mandated by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA"), 42 U.S.C. §§...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases