1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 259 A.D.2d
  5. 259 A.D.2d 723 (1999)
 

CAMARO v. AVR REALTY COMPANY

259 A.D.2d 723 (1999)

685 N.Y.S.2d 633

ROSLYN CAMARO, Respondent, v. AVR REALTY COMPANY, Defendant, and BRISBANE ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 29, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's conclusion that there are issues of fact warranting a trial, such that the appellants' motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, e.g., Glick v City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 402

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases