U.S. v. DURHAM

No. 97-6368.

178 F.3d 796 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Randell DURHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Marye (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Lexington, KY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen D. Milner (argued and briefed), Hughes, Lowry & Milner, Lexington, KY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; RYAN and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.

James Durham appeals the district court's denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to escape from a halfway house, arguing that the government coerced him into pleading guilty. Durham also appeals the district court's denial of his Rule 35(c) motion to correct his sentence. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying either motion. The factors articulated in United States v. Spencer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases