1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 133 Ohio
  5. 133 Ohio App.3d 837 (1999)
 

R.E. HOLLAND EXCAVATING CO., INC. v. MONTGOMERY CTY. BD. OF COMMRS.

No. 17633.

133 Ohio App.3d 837 (1999)

R.E. HOLLAND EXCAVATING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County.

Decided June 25, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter C. Krier and Michael W. Sandner, for appellant.

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Marcell N. Dezarn, and Gregory P. Dunsky, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellees.

FAIN, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, R.E. Holland Excavating Company, Inc. ("Holland"), contends that the trial court erred by rendering summary judgment against it on its complaint for breach of contract. In support, Holland contends that although the trial court correctly found that the sixty-day limitations period contracted for by Holland was unreasonably short, the trial court erred by then failing to apply the statutory limitations period contained in R.C. 2305...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases