VILLAGE OF SHEFFIELD v. ROWLAND

No. 98-1674.

87 Ohio St.3d 9 (1999)

VILLAGE OF SHEFFIELD, APPELLANT, v. ROWLAND, D.B.A. ROWLAND ENTERPRISES, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 13, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Szekely; Ward & Associates, Alan E. Johnson and Leo R. Ward, for appellant.

Baumgartner & O'Toole, Daniel D. Mason and Kenneth S. Stumphauzer, for appellee Billy S. Rowland, d.b.a. Rowland Enterprises, assignee in interest to Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.

Barrett & Weber, C. Francis Barrett and M. Michele Fleming, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.

Barry M. Byron, Stephen L. Byron and John Gotherman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Municipal League.


PFEIFER, J.

In this case, we must determine whether Sections 660.19 and 1155.05 of the Sheffield Village Codified Ordinances are in conflict with R.C. Chapter 3714. For the reasons that follow, we determine that they are.

Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution states that "[m]unicipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases