[THE STATE EX REL.] ABNER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ELLIOTT, JUDGE, APPELLEE.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted January 26, 1999.
Decided March 17, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook and Andrew S. Lipton; Pratt & Singer Co., L.P.A., and Michael R. Thomas; Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, L.L.P., and J. Craig Wright, for appellants.
John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Victoria Daiker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Baker & Hostetler L.L.P. and Robin E. Harvey, urging affirmance for amici curiae, CBS Corp., f.k.a. Westinghouse Corp., Georgia Pacific Corp., and Uniroyal, Inc.
Baker & Hostetler L.L.P. and Wade Mitchell, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Beazer East, Inc.
Barron, Peck & Bennie and Dave W. Peck, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, North American Refractories.
Israel, Wood & Puntil, P.C., and Chris Beck, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, General Refractories.
Willman & Arnold and Ruth Antinone, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Combustion Engineering.
Regina M. Massetti, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ogelbay Norton Co.
Cash, Cash, Eagen & Kessel and Thomas L. Eagen, Jr., urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Mallenkrodt, Inc.
Benesch, Friedlander, Caplan & Aronoff and Frederic X. Shadley, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, AndCo., Inc.
Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman and Edward J. Cass, urging affirmance for amici curiae, George Reintjes and Janos Industrial Corp.
Thompson, Hine & Flory and Barbara J. Arison, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Flintkote Co.
Bonezzi, Switzer, Murphy & Polido and Kevin O. Kadlec, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, ICF Kaiser Engineers.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Richard Schuster, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, ACandS, Inc.
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Reginald S. Kramer, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, PPG Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Per Curiam.
Oral Argument
Appellants request oral argument for this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2). Among the factors we consider in determining whether to grant oral argument under S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2) are whether the case involves a matter of great importance, complex issues of law or fact, a substantial constitutional issue, or a conflict between courts of appeals. State...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
