Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence adduced at the new Wade hearing, held in open court, fully supports both the hearing court's conclusion that the circumstances surrounding the identifications of the defendant were not unduly suggestive, and our previous determination that the testimony of the confidential informant was not necessary at the hearing (see, People v Chipp,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.