Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court did not violate his right to due process, nor did it extend his placement based upon an improper determination that he is a "sex offender". Rather, the extension was properly premised upon material and relevant proof which established by a preponderance of the evidence that the appellant engaged in inappropriate and sometimes violent behavior...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
