1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 56 F.Supp.2d
  5. 56 F.Supp.2d 906 (1999)
 

MATUSKA v. HINCKLEY TP.

No. 1:97CV2150.

56 F.Supp.2d 906 (1999)

John MATUSKA, Plaintiff, v. HINCKLEY TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

July 28, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ari H. Jaffe, Kohrman, Jackson & Krantz, Cleveland, OH, Susan L. Gragel, Robert J. Rotatori, Sr., Rotatori, Gragel & Stoper, Cleveland, OH, Natalie F. Grubb, Medina, OH, for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Wiencek, Brouse & McDowell, Akron, OH, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER RE: GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MATIA, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46). The Court has considered the memorandum in support (Doc. 47), plaintiff's memorandum in opposition (Doc. 51), and defendants' reply memorandum (Doc. 54). The Court has also considered plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases