1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 71 F.Supp.2d
  5. 71 F.Supp.2d 885 (1999)
 

HAINKE v. GLEESON, SKLAR, SAWYERS & CUMPATA LLP

No. 98 C 6282.

71 F.Supp.2d 885 (1999)

Kirsten HAINKE, Plaintiff, v. GLEESON, SKLAR, SAWYERS & CUMPATA LLP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

November 8, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred R. Kimmel & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff Kirsten Hainke.

Michael S. Poulos, Sally J. McDonald and Kim Matsunaga of Rudnick & Wolfe, Chicago, IL, for Defendant Gleeson, Sklar, Sawyers & Cumpata LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Kirsten Hainke ("Hainke") has sued her ex-employer Gleeson, Sklar, Sawyers & Cumpata LLP ("Gleeson"), claiming that Gleeson (1) violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA," 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 121171) by terminating her employment because of her various medical conditions, (2) violated Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases